Photo: Nolan Guichon
Victoria/Vancouver — As Taseko Mines once again attempts to force its way with an injunction to start drilling in Tŝilhqot’in ancestral territory at Fish Lake (Teztan Biny) without the consent of the Nation, a broad network of citizens, experts, and environmental organizations are calling for urgent reform of BC’s outdated mining laws.
The new network, launched in May 2019, is urging the B.C. government to reform the Mineral Tenure Act to respect no-go zones and decisions by local residents and First Nations, in line with best practices and international law (see reports and this article this article).
Need for reforms
“We don’t want mining claims to undermine community-based land use planning, environmental protection, and private property any longer. B.C.’s laws should require Indigenous consent and meaningful public participation in the assessment of mining activities.”
Calvin Sandborn, University of Victoria Environmental Law Centre and co-founder of the BC Mining Law Reform Network
“BC’s gold rush era mining laws, which give mining activity priority over virtually all other land uses, are out of touch with today’s realities. Building a responsible, modern mining sector that has social license to thrive in BC needs to begin with updating our mining laws.”
Andrew Gage, West Coast Environmental Law Association
The federal government rejected Taseko’s New Prosperity mine proposal twice in the past, yet the province approved it through its previous Environmental Assessment Act. The most recent exploratory permits were approved in the last days of the previous government in 2017. The current mineral tenure laws grant mining first and priority use of the land.
B.C. lagging behind
“BC is lagging behind as most major mining jurisdictions have modernized their mineral tenure regimes in the past decade. BC can learn from other jurisdictions and identify and implement best practices.”
Ugo Lapointe, MiningWatch Canada
“It’s time for the B.C. government to update our mining laws to include reasonable restrictions on where mineral claims and mining leases are allowed. Ensuring mineral activity respects land-use plans and limits around certain areas, such as key salmon habitat, drinking water sources, and culturally sensitive sites, will go a long way to avoid conflicts from First Nations and local communities.”
Nikki Skuce, Northern Confluence
“B.C. must uphold its commitment to review and modernize its laws to respect the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”
Tara Scurr, Amnesty International Canada
More than one conflict
The groups are also concerned about Imperial Metals preparing to drill into the fragile Skagit Watershed next to Manning Park despite clear local opposition and deep concerns from our U.S. neighbours.
“This is the same company that has not paid a cent in fines for the 2014 Mount Polley disaster near Quesnel Lake, the largest mine waste spill in Canadian history and if Canada fails to prosecute soon, they will walk away scot-free.”
Joe Foy, Wilderness Committee
For Information:
- Calvin Sandborn, University of Victoria’s Environmental Law Centre, 250-472-5248
- Andrew Gage, West Coast Environmental Law Association, 250-412-9784
- Nikki Skuce, Northern Confluence Initiative, 778-210-0117
- Ugo Lapointe, MiningWatch Canada, 514-708-0134
- Tara Scurr, Amnesty International Canada, 250-703-1141
- Joe Foy, Wilderness Committee, 604-880-2580